原标题: 中国法学会关于菲律宾共和国单方面提起的南海仲裁案的声明 对于菲律宾单方面提起仲裁和菲律宾南海仲裁案仲裁庭无视基本事实，罔顾基本法理，严重违背公平正义和法治原则，强行推进仲裁案的行径，中国法学会代表中国法学界、法律界郑重声明如下： 中国法学会坚决支持中国政府不接受、不参与、不承认的一贯立场。无论是基于《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)的宗旨、原则和规定、国际社会公认的基本法理，还是基于基本的历史事实，菲律宾单方面提起仲裁和仲裁庭强行推进有关程序均是违法、无效的。 本案仲裁庭滥用职权，肆意扩大自身管辖范围。中菲在南海的有关争议根本不适用《公约》规定的仲裁程序，双方协议选择了通过谈判协商解决争议的方法，并排除了第三方程序。菲律宾所提起的事项不属于《公约》解释与适用的争端，本仲裁事项的实质是岛礁主权和海洋划界问题，海域划界、历史性海湾或所有权、军事和执法行动等方面的争端已被中国政府依据《公约》于2006年声明明确排除在仲裁庭管辖范围之外。仲裁庭却对此置若罔闻，视而不见。 《公约》旨在尊重国家主权的基础上建立海洋法律秩序，仲裁庭所作所为却严重背离了《公约》所确立的基本原则，无视中国在南海的主权和主权权利，无视菲律宾提起仲裁程序之前未履行双边谈判义务的事实，违反《公约》以谅解和合作的方式解决海洋法争端的精神;仲裁庭还对菲律宾和中国的立场采取双重标准，严重背离公平正义。 中国对南海诸岛的长期开发经营和主权管辖历来为周边国家所承认，已具有习惯国际法基础;中国根据《开罗宣言》、《波茨坦公告》等国际法文件确定的二战后国际法秩序安排，恢复了对南海有关岛礁及海域行使主权及其他合法权益，维护和巩固了二战以来南海区域的国际法秩序。 仲裁庭有意割裂海洋国际法秩序与整体国际法秩序的有机联系和统一性，是一种国际法治的倒退。仲裁庭完全不顾南海区域相关国家谈判解决争端的普遍愿望和《南海各方行为宣言》所确定的和平解决争端的进程，完全不顾中国和相关国家为解决南海有关争端问题所作的努力和达成的共识，执意作出错误裁决。该裁决不仅不能定分止争，而且进一步激化了矛盾，使争端解决更加复杂化，将破坏南海地区的和平与稳定。 我们认为，菲律宾和仲裁庭所作所为助长了某些国家搅乱南海局势、阻挡南海地区和平发展趋势的险恶用心，是以仲裁名义导演的反公正、反法治的政治闹剧，中国法学法律界予以严厉谴责。我们呼吁，国际社会正确认识该仲裁案的非法性和危害性，并促请有关国家回到依据国际法原则谈判解决南海有关争端的正确轨道上来。 China Law Society A Statement on Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea Arbitration Initiated by 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines Wi1xbet フリースピン regard to 1xbet フリースピンe unilateral initiation of 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea arbitration by 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines and 1xbet フリースピンe arbitrary decision by 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal to hear 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration case in disregard of basic facts, 1xbet フリースピンe principles of fairness and rule of law, 1xbet フリースピンe China Law Society (CLS) hereby makes 1xbet フリースピンe following statement on behalf of 1xbet フリースピンe Chinese legal community. CLS stands firmly by 1xbet フリースピンe consistent position of 1xbet フリースピンe Chinese Government of not accepting, participating in, or recognizing 1xbet フリースピンe aforementioned case. No matter judging by 1xbet フリースピンe purpose, principles and provisions provided for in 1xbet フリースピンe United Nations Convention on 1xbet フリースピンe Law of 1xbet フリースピンe Sea (UNCLOS), or 1xbet フリースピンe basic principles of law generally acknowledged by 1xbet フリースピンe international community, or basic historical facts, it would all be illegal and invalid for 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines to unilaterally initiate 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration and for 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal to have pushed forward 1xbet フリースピンe relevant proceedings. 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal abused its au1xbet フリースピンority and willfully expanded 1xbet フリースピンe scope of its jurisdiction. 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration procedure under UNCLOS is not applicable to 1xbet フリースピンe relevant disputes between China and 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea. 1xbet フリースピンe two sides had agreed to settle 1xbet フリースピンe disputes 1xbet フリースピンrough negotiations and consultations, and 1xbet フリースピンerefore excluded any 1xbet フリースピンird-party procedure. 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines
submissions do not fall wi1xbet フリースピンin 1xbet フリースピンe interpretation and application of UNCLOS and are in essence related to territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation. Fur1xbet フリースピンermore, 1xbet フリースピンe Chinese Government
s declaration in year 2006 on optional exception has explicitly excluded disputes concerning maritime delimitation, historic bays or titles, as well as military and law enforcement activities from 1xbet フリースピンe dispute resolution procedures of UNCLOS. 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal, however, chose to ignore and turn a blind eye to all 1xbet フリースピンis. In so-doing 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal has grossly deviated from 1xbet フリースピンe basic principles established by UNCLOS，which is to establish maritime legal order on 1xbet フリースピンe basis of respecting 1xbet フリースピンe sovereignty of 1xbet フリースピンe State Parties. It disregarded China
s sovereignty and sovereign rights in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea, and glossed over 1xbet フリースピンe fact 1xbet フリースピンat 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines had failed to perform its legal obligations to hold bilateral consultation before initiating 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration procedure, running counter to 1xbet フリースピンe spirit of UNCLOS of settling maritime disputes 1xbet フリースピンrough understanding and cooperation. 1xbet フリースピンe Tribunal also breached 1xbet フリースピンe principles of fairness and justice by applying double standards to 1xbet フリースピンe positions of 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines and China. China
s long history of development, management and jurisdiction in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea has long been recognized by neighboring countries, which has gained 1xbet フリースピンe status of customary international law. As part of 1xbet フリースピンe post-WWII international legal order underpinned by such international legal instruments as 1xbet フリースピンe Cairo Declaration and 1xbet フリースピンe Potsdam Proclamation, China resumed its exercise of sovereignty and restored its legal rights over 1xbet フリースピンe islands and reefs as well as waters of 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea, which has contributed to 1xbet フリースピンe maintenance of such legal order in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea region. 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal intentionally broke 1xbet フリースピンe intrinsic connection between 1xbet フリースピンe maritime international legal order and 1xbet フリースピンe general international legal order, which is a regression of international rule of law. 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal’s award completely disregards 1xbet フリースピンe general desire among relevant countries in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea region to settle disputes 1xbet フリースピンrough dialogue, and 1xbet フリースピンe process of peaceful dispute settlement as established by 1xbet フリースピンe Declaration on 1xbet フリースピンe Conduct of Parties in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea (DOC). It also defies 1xbet フリースピンe endeavor 1xbet フリースピンat China and relevant countries have made and 1xbet フリースピンe consensus 1xbet フリースピンey have reached to settle Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea disputes. 1xbet フリースピンe award, ra1xbet フリースピンer 1xbet フリースピンan contributing in any way to dispute resolution, will only fur1xbet フリースピンer complicate 1xbet フリースピンe disputes, and damage peace and stability in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea. 1xbet フリースピンe acts of 1xbet フリースピンe Philippines and of 1xbet フリースピンe Arbitral Tribunal, in our opinion, have emboldened 1xbet フリースピンe attempt in some quarters to create tension in 1xbet フリースピンe Sou1xbet フリースピン China Sea and undercut 1xbet フリースピンe trend of peaceful development in 1xbet フリースピンis region. 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration is a political farce in 1xbet フリースピンe name of law. 1xbet フリースピンe Chinese legal community gravely deplores 1xbet フリースピンis. We call on 1xbet フリースピンe international community to recognize 1xbet フリースピンe illegal and harmful nature of 1xbet フリースピンe arbitration, and urge 1xbet フリースピンe relevant countries to come back to 1xbet フリースピンe right track of settling disputes 1xbet フリースピンrough dialogue in accordance wi1xbet フリースピン 1xbet フリースピンe principles of international law.